“Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered.
‘Should the wise men answer with windy knowledge?
Should the wise men fill themselves with the east wind?
Should they argue in unprofitable talk?
Should they argue in words with which they can do no good?
But you are doing away with the fear of God.
You are hindering meditation before God.
Your iniquity teaches your mouth.
You choose the tongue of the crafty.
Your own mouth condemns you!
Your own lips testify against you.’”
This is now a second round of discourses, like a work of the Greek philosopher Plato. This time Eliphaz began again by ripping into Job, claiming that Job should be condemned by his own words. Wise men do not answer with windy knowledge. This was an unprofitable east wind talk that does no good. Job was doing away with the fear of God, hindering mediation about God. There was iniquity in the mouth of Job with his crafty tongue. He was condemned by his own mouth and lips. This was very harsh about Job after his original kind words in the first discourse.